Stocktaking for National Adaptation Planning (SNAP)

An approach to assess capacities for implementing NDCs

Description

SNAP is a tool to assess, enhance, and monitor a country’s capacity for adaptation planning. This publication showcases the utility and use of the tool and highlights results from its application in various geographical terrains on national and subnational scale. The SNAP tool is one of the most widely used tools in GIZ’s armoury of support instruments for the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process.

If you have questions or comments on the SNAP tool please contact Nikola.Rass@giz.de or Till.Below@giz.de

Target Group NAP focal points, technical support units for NAP, donor agencies, organisations supporting NAP planning, and the wider public interested in the NAP process.
Type of resource Conceptual framework and practical case descriptions
Downloads SNAP: Stocktaking for National Adaptation Planning – Assessing Capacity for Implementing NDCs (English)

 

Other resources on adaptation M&E

The following presents a number of further resources on adaptation M&E with a particular focus on applications at the national level.

IIED’s Tracking Adaptation and Measuring Development (TAMD) approach focuses on monitoring climate risk management (institutions, policies, capacities) as well as adaptation and development outcomes. Scorecards can be used to tailor indicators to the respective context. TAMD has been applied in several countries at national and community level. The Government of Cambodia, for instance, has decided to use TAMD for its national adaptation M&E framework. GIZ has partnered with IIED to develop sector specific indicators in Cambodia for health, agriculture and transportation. The Cambodian M&E framework and sector indicators are described in a detailed report from 2015. All TAMD resources, including a step-by-step guide, are available on IIED’s website.

UKCIP, as part of the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford, has developed a synthesis of tools, frameworks and approaches for the monitoring & evaluation for climate change adaptation and resilience (2014). It also has published guidance notes related to M&E of adaptation: Twelve reasons why climate change adaptation M&E is challenging, Selecting indicators for climate change adaptation programming, Theory of Change approach to climate change adaptation programming.

In 2015 the online community of practice Climate-Eval published a good practice study on “Principles for Indicator Development, Selection, and Use in Climate ChangeAdaptation Monitoring and Evaluation”.

In relation to the German Adaptation Strategy, Germany’s Federal Environment Agency (UBA) developed an indicator system (English Summary: p. 1-15) to monitor climate change impacts and adaptation responses. The monitoring system is also described in this factsheet as part of GIZ’s comparative analysis study of adaptation M&E systems. The first adaptation monitoring report based on the indicator system was published in 2015 (currently only available in German).

The OECD published a report on methodological challenges of adaptation M&E in 2014 and a report on early practices of national adaptation M&E systems including case studies of Germany, Kenya and the Philippines (complementary to the study by GIZ).

The European Environment Agency published an overview of adaptation M&E efforts by its European member countries in December 2015. The report has been presented alongside the GIZ national adaptation M&E guidebook at the Adaptation Futures Conference in May 2016 in Rotterdam.

In 2013 the Adaptation Committee under the UNFCCC conducted a workshop on monitoring and evaluation of adaptation at national level. The workshop report and presentations can be found here.

The journal New Directions for Evaluation published a special issue in 2015 on adaptation M&E including an article on how to link national and subnational adaptation M&E systems.

Assessing and Monitoring Climate Resilience

An approach to monitor climate resilience at the national level

Description

The discussion paper by GIZ and the United Nations University specifies resilience as consisting of three different capacities: absorptive, adaptive and transformative capacity. Each capacity can be described along five dimensions: social, ecological, economic, physical and institutional. Taken together, this understanding of resilience leads to the climate resilience matrix (capacities times dimensions) which forms the foundation to assess resilience.

The discussion paper suggests two approaches for an assessment: defining (proxy) indicators for each dimension of each capacity or employing household surveys. A list of generic indicators with global data availability is provided, although applications need to be tailored to the needs and objectives of each country.

Target Group Technical advisors and policy makers, implementing agencies and NGOs
Type of resource Conceptual framework, repository of indicators
Downloads
Assessing and Monitoring Climate Resilience (2.6 MB)
Assessing and Monitoring Climate Resilience. Discussion paper.
Valoración y Seguimiento de la Resiliencia Climática (1.8 MB)
Un Documento de Debate. (Spanish Translation of "Assessing and Monitoring climate resilience")

 

Developing national Adaptation M&E systems

A guidebook for the development of (sub)national adaptation M&E systems

Description

This guidebook provides orientation for the development of (sub)national adaptation M&E systems. It takes a step-by-step approach, providing reference to existing approaches and practical examples at each step. The guidebook serves as supplementary material to the UNFCCC NAP Technical Guidelines established by the Least Developed Countries Expert Group (LEG).

Target Group Policy-makers and technical advisors involved in the development of (sub)national adaptation M&E systems.
Type of resource Step-by-step guide
Downloads A Guidebook to develop national Adaptation M&E Systems (GIZ & IISD 2015)

Développer des systèmes nationaux de suivi et évaluation de l’adaptation : guide méthodologique (GIZ & IISD 2015)

 

Repository of Adaptation Indicators

Systematic collection of adaptation indicators of national-level adaptation M&E systems

Description

The repository of adaptation indicators is intended to illustrate possible adaptation indicators and their application context, thereby supporting the context – specific formulation of indicators. The repository systematically presents various indicators for four focus areas:

  • climate parameters
  • climate change impacts
  • adaptation actions
  • adaptation results

The examples have been taken from currently proposed national adaptation M&E systems (i.e. they reflect the first generation of indicators). For each indicator, its adaptation relevance, limitations, data needs and sources are described. The repository is meant to illustrate possible indicators – their applicability to other contexts needs to be assessed on a case by case basis. It is an output of the study on ► “Monitoring and Evaluating Adaptation at Aggregated Levels: A comparative analysis of ten systems”. The repository is available as PDF as well as as Excel file. Please note that the Excel file is also embedded in the PDF and can be extracted by opening it and clicking on the attachement symbol in the bar on the left.

Target Group Individuals involved or interested in national adaptation M&E systems
Type of resource Repository of indicators
Downloads
Repository of adaptation indicatots at national level (PDF) - GIZ 2014 (1.6 MB)
Illustrative repository of adaptation indicators including their application context from numerous countries. It includes an identical Excel file as attachement.
Repository of adaptation indicators at national level (Excel) - GIZ 2014 (193.4 KB)
Excel file of the repository (Content identical to the PDF version)
Repositorio de Indicadores de Adaptación - GIZ 2014 (1.6 MB)
Spanish Translation of the Repository of Adaptation Indicators

 

 

 

 

 

Monitoring and Evaluating Adaptation at Aggregated Levels: A comparative analysis of ten systems

An overview and analysis of 10 national adaptation M&E systems

Description

This study analyses ten national adaptation M&E systems (France, Germany, Kenya, Mekong River Commission, Morocco, Nepal, Norway, Philippines, PPCR and UK). A factsheet for each country or organisation is describing the adaptation M&E system in detail including the institutional arrangements, the M&E method and the data and indicators used. The intention of the study is to make national adaptation M&E systems more tangible and illustrate how they can be designed. Adaptation indicators used by the examined countries are compiled in a separate repository ► “Repository of Adaptation Indicators“, which explains their relevance for adaptation and provides details on data sources and calculation.

Target Group Individuals involved or interested in national adaptation M&E systems
Type of resource Study and practical case descriptions
Downloads
Comparative analysis of 10 adaptation M&E systems at the national level (8.4 MB)
This report presents a comparative analysis of 10 existing national adaptation M&E systems and a factsheets for each to quickly grasp and learn from these cases.
Seguimiento y Evaluación de la Adaptación a Niveles Agregados: Un Análisis Comparativo de Diez Sistemas (8.8 MB)
Spanish Translation of the Comparative Analysis of ten national Adaptation M&E Systems
Suivre et évaluer l’adaptation au changement climatique à haut niveau (9.4 MB)
French Translation of the Comparative Analysis of ten national Adaptation M&E Systems

M&E factsheets are available for the following countries or organisations:

France Germany Kenya Mekong River Commission Mexico
Morocco Nepal Norway Philippines PPCR
UK Cambodia South Africa 

Les fiches d’information S&E sont disponibles pour les pays ou organisations suivants:

France Allemagne Kenya Commision du Mékong (Mexique)
Maroc Nepal Norvège Philippines PPCR
Royaume-Uni

Las fichas técnicas S&E son disponibles para los paises e organizaciones siguientes:

Francia Alemania Kenia Comisión del Río Mekong México
Marruecos Nepal Noruega Filipinas PPCR
Reino Unido